<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iMedia Law Blog &#187; DRM &amp; Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daledietrich.com/imedia/category/drm-tpms/drm-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daledietrich.com/imedia</link>
	<description>on DaleDietrich.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:43:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Michael Geist Concludes 30 Days of DRM</title>
		<link>http://daledietrich.com/imedia/michael-geist-concludes-30-days-of-drm/</link>
		<comments>http://daledietrich.com/imedia/michael-geist-concludes-30-days-of-drm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 23:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dale Dietrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artists Against DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Media v Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA-like Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM & Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM Arms Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM Circumvention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM Restricting Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM as Market Lock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use/Dealing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intrusive TPMs - Rootkits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daledietrich.com/imedia/2006/09/18/michael-geist-concludes-30-days-of-drm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Version of 30 Days of DRM
Canadian Copyright reform is in the air. In anticipation of possible legislative action this fall, Michael Geist&#8217;s 30 day series of daily articles &#8220;30 Days of DRM&#8221; has come to an end. While he ultimately argues, as I do, that it would be preferable NOT to adopt DMCA-like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="85" height="60" style="border: 0px none ; padding: 5px; float: left" src="http://www.daledietrich.com/thumbs/geist.jpg" /> <span class="news_date"><a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/component/option,com_docman/task,doc_download/gid,8/"><img src="http://www.daledietrich.com/graphics/pdf.jpg" /><span class="textof"> Version of 30 Days of DRM</span></a><br />
<span class="news_text">Canadian Copyright reform is in the air. In anticipation of possible legislative action this fall, Michael Geist&#8217;s 30 day series of daily articles &#8220;30 Days of DRM&#8221; has come to an end. While he ultimately argues, as I do, that it would be preferable NOT to adopt </span></span><span class="news_date"><span class="news_text"><a href="http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sup_01_17_10_12.html">DMCA</a>-</span></span><span class="news_date"><span class="news_text">like anti-circumvention legislation in Canada, the Conservative government may succumb to the copyright lobby. These articles, which are quite good, propose limitations that should be included in any such Canadian <a href="http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sup_01_17_10_12.html">DMCA</a>-like legislation to fairly protect Canadian consumers and to guard against the multitude of problems created by the U.S.&#8217;s enactment of anti-circumvention measures in the U.S. <a href="http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sup_01_17_10_12.html">Digital Millennium Copyright Act</a>.</span><br />
<span class="sidebar_link_spacer"> </span><br />
<strong><span class="source">30 Days of DRM:</span></strong><br />
<span class="news_link">  	- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1369/125/">Day 1 &#8211; Linking Copyright and Anti-Circumvention (Markets)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1370/125/">Day 2 &#8211; Region Coding (Markets)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1374/125/">Day 3 &#8211; Oversite of DRM Misuse (Markets)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1376/125/">Day 4 &#8211; DRM Misuse Sanctions (Markets)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1378/125/">Day 5 &#8211; DRM Labeling and Consumer Awareness (Public Protection)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1383/125/">Day 6 &#8211; Interoperability (Public Protection and Markets)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1386/195/">Day 7 &#8211; DRM-Free Library Deposits (Public Protection)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1389/195/">Day 8 &#8211; Privacy (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1391/125/">Day 9 &#8211; Reverse Engineering (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1393/125/">Day 10 &#8211; Security Research(Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1396/125/">Day 11 &#8211; Involuntary Installation of Software (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1399/125/">Day 12 &#8211; Research and Private Study (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1401/125/">Day 13 &#8211; Criticism, Review and News Reporting (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1404/125/">Day 14 &#8211; Private Copying (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1405/195/">Day 15 &#8211; Artistic Access (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1407/195/">Day 16 &#8211; System Repair (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1408/195/">Day 17 &#8211; Broken or Obsolete Technology (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1412/195/">Day 18 &#8211; Backup Copies of Software (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1414/195/">Day 19 &#8211; Backup Copies of Digital Consumer Products (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1417/195/">Day 20 &#8211; Public Domain (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1421/195/">Day 21 &#8211; Print Disabilities Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1422/195/">Day 22 &#8211; Libraries (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1424/195/">Day 23 &#8211; Education Institutions (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1427/195/">Day 24 &#8211; Time Shifting (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1429/195/">Day 25 &#8211; Statutory Obligations (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1430/195/">Day 26 &#8211; Investigation of Concealed Code (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1434/195/">Day 27 &#8211; Government Works (DRM Policy)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1437/195/">Day 28 &#8211; Review of New Circumvention Rights (Circumvention Rights)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1440/195/">Day 29 &#8211; No Ban on Circumvention Devices (Foundation Issue)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1442/195/">Day 30 &#8211; Prohibition on Contractual Circumvention of Rights (Foundation Issue)</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1447/195/">30 Things You Can Do</a>	</span></span><strong><span class="source" /></strong></p>
<p><strong><span class="source">Source:</span> 	</strong><a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/daysofdrm"><span class="news_link">Michael Geist&#8217;s 30 Days of DRM Page</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daledietrich.com/imedia/michael-geist-concludes-30-days-of-drm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EFF to EMI: Don&#8217;t Sue DMR Researchers</title>
		<link>http://daledietrich.com/imedia/eff-to-emi-dont-sue-dmr-researchers/</link>
		<comments>http://daledietrich.com/imedia/eff-to-emi-dont-sue-dmr-researchers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 17:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dale Dietrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DRM & Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daledietrich.com/imedia/2006/01/05/eff-to-emi-dont-sue-dmr-researchers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[         Text of Open Letter
EFF Urges EMI in an open letter not to assert any claims under EULAs or the DMCA against security researchers who have been, are, or will be working to identify security problems with copy protection technologies used on EMI compact discs.

Sources:   [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/004293.php">       <img width="85" height="60" style="border: 0px none ; padding: 5px; float: left" src="http://www.daledietrich.com/thumbs/EFF.jpg" /></a> <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/004293.php"><span class="news_title" /></a><span class="news_date" /><a href="http://www.daledietrich.com/Source%20Docs/EFF_Open_Letter_to_EMI_%28Jan_4_2006%29.pdf"><span class="textof"><img border="0" src="http://www.daledietrich.com/graphics/pdf.jpg" /> Text of Open Letter</span></a><br />
<span class="news_text">EFF Urges EMI in an open letter not to assert any claims under EULAs or the DMCA against security researchers who have been, are, or will be working to identify security problems with copy protection technologies used on EMI compact discs.<br />
</span><br />
<strong><span class="source">Sources:</span></strong>     <span class="news_link"><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/004293.php">EFF</a></span>     <span class="news_link"> | </span>     <span class="news_link"><a href="http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=technologyNews&#038;storyID=2006-01-06T002007Z_01_MUN601116_RTRIDST_0_TECH-MEDIA-EMI-DC.XML&#038;archived=False">Reuters</a></span>     <span class="news_link"> | </span>     <span class="news_link"><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060105-5907.html">ars technica</a></span>     <span class="news_link"> | </span>     <span class="news_link"><a href="http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3575441">Internet News</a></span>     <span class="news_link"> | </span>     <span class="news_link"><a href="http://p2pnet.net/story/7507">P2PNet</a></span>     <span class="news_link"> | </span>     <span class="news_link"><a href="http://www.digital-copyright.ca/node/1667">Digital Copyright Canada</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daledietrich.com/imedia/eff-to-emi-dont-sue-dmr-researchers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
