Dale Dietrich
on DaleDietrich.com
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Australian High Court Rules Against Kazaa

Categories: BigMedia v P2P ProvidersDecisions

Text of Decision (UMA v. Sharman)
The Federal Court of Australia decided on Monday that the Kazaa file-sharing network has authorized copyright infringement and must modify its technology to curtail infringing activities within two months. Providing authorization to infringe is a violation of Section 101 of the Australian Copyright Act and is somewhat similar to principles of secondary infringement in other copyright laws, such as vicarious infringement in US law.

Sources: DRM Watch | CNet | TechLawJournal | ZDNet

Related Posts:

Digg! Digg Del.icio.us  

  • Janice

    As a fresh man in law school I often read this kind of articles in order to learn more about law procedures. Is there any possible circumstance here for a Counterclaim from Kazaa?